![]() But yet again, Rome 2 has more, and better, campaigns. Attila has meaningful campaign events that drastically change how the game is played. ![]() Rome 2, however, has more unit variety and more unique maps. Attila has much more balanced units, for the most part, as well as a better battle map layout for sieges. Rome 2 on the other hand, has better faction distribution on the campaign map itself. ![]() So what’s the problem then, shouldn’t that mean that Attila is a straight improvement over Rome 2?Īgain, the answer to this is both yes and no.Īttila has a much prettier and well-made map, as well as more streamlined construction. What does that mean? Well, Attila for the most part has virtually all the mechanics that Rome 2 had, except it refined and rebalanced them, as well as adding a few new ones to the mix. You see, Attila suffers from being something I like to call a “standalone expansion”. “Hey, wait a minute!” I hear you ask, “These are two separate games, why are they shown together?” Calm down there, I’m getting to it. Bringining the light of civilization and our peaceful culture to the barbarian masses through force!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |